DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2003 BMW X5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 156

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeBMW
156ModelX5
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

6,3 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
250 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3179 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
250 HPPower218 HP
300 NmTorque500 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank93 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,0 lt
12,1 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/45 ZR 17Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4430 mmLength4667 mm
1745 mmWidth1872 mm
1415 mmHeight1715 mm
1410 KgWeight2170 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2003 BMW X5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…