DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Aristo vs 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 156

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeAlfa Romeo
AristoModel156
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,3 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement3179 cc
280 HPPower250 HP
432 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption18,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,6 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption12,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
225/55 R16Tyre size225/45 ZR 17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4430 mm
1800 mmWidth1745 mm
1435 mmHeight1415 mm
1680 KgWeight1410 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Aristo and 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…