DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Alfa Romeo 147 vs 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 156

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeAlfa Romeo
147Model156
2005Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

6,3 s0–100 km/h6,3 s
246 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3179 ccEngine displacement3179 cc
250 HPPower250 HP
300 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank63 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption18,1 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
12,1 ltAverage consumption12,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 ZR 17Tyre size225/45 ZR 17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4213 mmLength4430 mm
1764 mmWidth1745 mm
1412 mmHeight1415 mm
1360 KgWeight1410 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Alfa Romeo 147 and 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…