2003 • Suzuki
Forenza
Suzuki Forenza 2.0 (120 Hp) 2003Overall Score49/100
2003 Suzuki Forenza vs 2003 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 3.0 V6 (154 Hp) 2003Overall Score48.25/100
WINNER
Suzuki Forenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
49–48.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Suzuki ForenzaSpecificationFord Ranger
SuzukiMakeFord
ForenzaModelRanger
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Suzuki ForenzaSpecificationFord Ranger
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
120 HPPower154 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm
—Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Suzuki ForenzaSpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Suzuki ForenzaSpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Suzuki ForenzaSpecificationFord Ranger
4500 mmLength4763 mm
1725 mmWidth1786 mm
1445 mmHeight1648 mm
1250 KgWeight1397 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2835 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Suzuki Forenza and 2003 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Forenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSAlfa Romeo 156 vs Suzuki Forenza2003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVSGAZ 31 vs Suzuki Forenza2003 and 2003 model yearsVSFord Ranger vs Suzuki Forenza2003 and 2003 model years
VSNissan Presage vs Suzuki Forenza2003 and 2003 model years
VSHyundai Tuscani vs Suzuki Forenza2003 and 2003 model yearsComments are loading…