2003 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 3.0 V6 (154 Hp) 2003Overall Score48.25/100
2003 Ford Ranger vs 2003 Suzuki Forenza Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Suzuki
Forenza
Suzuki Forenza 2.0 (120 Hp) 2003Overall Score49/100
WINNER
Suzuki Forenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
48.25–49
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
FordMakeSuzuki
RangerModelForenza
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
154 HPPower120 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationSuzuki Forenza
4763 mmLength4500 mm
1786 mmWidth1725 mm
1648 mmHeight1445 mm
1397 KgWeight1250 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford Ranger and 2003 Suzuki Forenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Forenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…