DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 GAZ 31 vs 2003 Suzuki Forenza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Forenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

48.25–49
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZMakeSuzuki
31ModelForenza
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
150 HPPower120 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4500 mm
—Width1725 mm
—Height1445 mm
—Weight1250 Kg
—Wheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 GAZ 31 and 2003 Suzuki Forenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Forenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…