DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Suzuki Baleno vs 2016 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Figo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeFord
BalenoModelFigo
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1242 ccEngine displacement1196 cc
90 HPPower88 HP
120 NmTorque112 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank42 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength3995 mm
1745 mmWidth1695 mm
1470 mmHeight1525 mm
865 kgWeight—
320 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2491 mm

Additional Features

Suzuki BalenoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsReversing CameraLight SensorUSB PortBluetoothNavigation
Ford Figo

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Suzuki Baleno and 2016 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…