2016 • Ford
Figo
Ford Figo 1.2 Ti-VCT (88 Hp) 2016Overall Score57.5/100
2016 Ford Figo vs 2016 Suzuki Baleno Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Suzuki
Baleno
Suzuki Baleno GL 2016 1.2 90 HPOverall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Ford Figo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FigoSpecificationSuzuki Baleno
FordMakeSuzuki
FigoModelBaleno
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford FigoSpecificationSuzuki Baleno
—0–100 km/h12,2 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1196 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
88 HPPower90 HP
112 NmTorque120 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FigoSpecificationSuzuki Baleno
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank37 lt
—Urban consumption5,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
—Average consumption4,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FigoSpecificationSuzuki Baleno
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
175/65 R14Tyre size16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FigoSpecificationSuzuki Baleno
3995 mmLength3995 mm
1695 mmWidth1745 mm
1525 mmHeight1470 mm
—Weight865 kg
—Luggage capacity320 lt
2491 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Figo and 2016 Suzuki Baleno approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…