DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Nissan AD vs 2016 Suzuki Baleno Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeSuzuki
ADModelBaleno
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,2 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1240 ccEngine displacement1242 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
121 NmTorque120 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank37 lt
—Urban consumption5,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
—Average consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—TransmissionManual
—Tyre size16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength3995 mm
1695 mmWidth1745 mm
1500 mmHeight1470 mm
—Weight865 kg
—Luggage capacity320 lt
2600 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Nissan AD

No additional feature records are available.

Suzuki BalenoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsReversing CameraLight SensorUSB PortBluetoothNavigation

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Nissan AD and 2016 Suzuki Baleno approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…