DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Subaru Outback vs 2003 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Outback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMitsubishi
OutbackModelL 200
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
197 km/hTop speed142 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
156 HPPower100 HP
223 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4730 mmLength4500 mm
1770 mmWidth1655 mm
1545 mmHeight1570 mm
1480 KgWeight1810 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2230 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Subaru Outback and 2003 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Outback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…