DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Navara vs 2003 Subaru Outback Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Outback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeSubaru
NavaraModelOutback
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed197 km/h
2389 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
148 HPPower156 HP
208 NmTorque223 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption12,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
—Average consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5220 mmLength4730 mm
1850 mmWidth1770 mm
1774 mmHeight1545 mm
—Weight1480 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Navara and 2003 Subaru Outback approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Outback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…