DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volvo XC90 vs 2003 Subaru Outback Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Outback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeSubaru
XC90ModelOutback
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
185 km/hTop speed197 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
163 HPPower156 HP
340 NmTorque223 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank64 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
—Average consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/70 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4800 mmLength4730 mm
1890 mmWidth1770 mm
1740 mmHeight1545 mm
2095 KgWeight1480 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volvo XC90 and 2003 Subaru Outback approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Outback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…