DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Subaru Forester vs 2002 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeLand Rover
ForesterModelFreelander
2002Model year2002
CrossoverBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,1 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
165 HPPower177 HP
225 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption17,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
215/60 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4450 mmLength4433 mm
1735 mmWidth1809 mm
1585 mmHeight1709 mm
1455 KgWeight1550 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Subaru Forester and 2002 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…