DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Land Rover Freelander vs 2002 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeSubaru
FreelanderModelForester
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
177 HPPower165 HP
240 NmTorque225 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption—
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4450 mm
1809 mmWidth1735 mm
1709 mmHeight1585 mm
1550 KgWeight1455 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Land Rover Freelander and 2002 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…