2002 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.5 V6 TDI (150 Hp) 2002Overall Score64.75/100
2002 Opel Omega vs 2002 Subaru Forester Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.5i (165Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Subaru Forester
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationSubaru Forester
OpelMakeSubaru
OmegaModelForester
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationSubaru Forester
11,0 s0–100 km/h—
206 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
150 HPPower165 HP
300 NmTorque225 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationSubaru Forester
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationSubaru Forester
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationSubaru Forester
4898 mmLength4450 mm
1775 mmWidth1735 mm
1450 mmHeight1585 mm
1610 KgWeight1455 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2525 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Opel Omega and 2002 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…