2000 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.0 S -Turbo (170 Hp) 2000Overall Score63.25/100
2000 Subaru Forester vs 2000 Toyota Celica Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
Celica
Toyota Celica 1.8 i GT- R (182 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Subaru Forester
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru ForesterSpecificationToyota Celica
SubaruMakeToyota
ForesterModelCelica
2000Model year2000
CrossoverBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Subaru ForesterSpecificationToyota Celica
8,4 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
198 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
170 HPPower182 HP
240 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru ForesterSpecificationToyota Celica
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru ForesterSpecificationToyota Celica
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru ForesterSpecificationToyota Celica
4460 mmLength4328 mm
1735 mmWidth1735 mm
1580 mmHeight1305 mm
1445 KgWeight1190 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Subaru Forester and 2000 Toyota Celica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…