2000 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 2.0 i (170 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
2000 Mazda Capella vs 2000 Subaru Forester Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.0 S -Turbo (170 Hp) 2000Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Subaru Forester
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CapellaSpecificationSubaru Forester
MazdaMakeSubaru
CapellaModelForester
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda CapellaSpecificationSubaru Forester
—0–100 km/h8,4 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
180 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CapellaSpecificationSubaru Forester
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CapellaSpecificationSubaru Forester
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CapellaSpecificationSubaru Forester
4665 mmLength4460 mm
1965 mmWidth1735 mm
1510 mmHeight1580 mm
1320 KgWeight1445 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2525 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Capella and 2000 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…