DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Peugeot 306 vs 2000 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeSubaru
306ModelForester
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
220 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
163 HPPower170 HP
193 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption12,8 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
9,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
195/55 R15 VTyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4030 mmLength4460 mm
1689 mmWidth1735 mm
1350 mmHeight1580 mm
1215 KgWeight1445 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Peugeot 306 and 2000 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…