2000 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.0 S -Turbo (170 Hp) 2000Overall Score63.25/100
2000 Subaru Forester vs 2000 Mazda Capella Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 2.0 i (170 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Subaru Forester
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda Capella
SubaruMakeMazda
ForesterModelCapella
2000Model year2000
CrossoverBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda Capella
8,4 s0–100 km/h—
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
240 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda Capella
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda Capella
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
215/60 R16Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda Capella
4460 mmLength4665 mm
1735 mmWidth1965 mm
1580 mmHeight1510 mm
1445 KgWeight1320 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Subaru Forester and 2000 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…