2000 • Subaru
Forester
Subaru Forester 2.0 S -Turbo (170 Hp) 2000Overall Score63.25/100
2000 Subaru Forester vs 2000 Mazda Capella Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 2.0 i (167 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Subaru Forester
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda Capella
SubaruMakeMazda
ForesterModelCapella
2000Model year2000
CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda Capella
8,4 s0–100 km/h—
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
170 HPPower167 HP
240 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda Capella
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda Capella
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
215/60 R16Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Subaru ForesterSpecificationMazda Capella
4460 mmLength4575 mm
1735 mmWidth1695 mm
1580 mmHeight1440 mm
1445 KgWeight1210 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Subaru Forester and 2000 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…