2003 • Smart
Crossblade
Smart Crossblade 0.6 i (70 Hp) 2003Overall Score39.5/100
2003 Smart Crossblade vs 1999 Smart Fortwo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Smart
Fortwo
Smart Fortwo 0.7 i (61 Hp) 1999Overall Score38.5/100
WINNER
Smart Crossblade
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationSmart Fortwo
SmartMakeSmart
CrossbladeModelFortwo
2003Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats2
2Doors3
Performance
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationSmart Fortwo
16,8 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
135 km/hTop speed135 km/h
599 ccEngine displacement698 cc
70 HPPower61 HP
100 NmTorque95 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationSmart Fortwo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
22 ltFuel tank33 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
—Average consumption4,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationSmart Fortwo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/40 R16; 215/35 R16Tyre size145/65 R15; 175/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationSmart Fortwo
2500 mmLength2500 mm
1515 mmWidth1515 mm
1549 mmHeight1549 mm
730 KgWeight805 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase1812 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Smart Crossblade and 1999 Smart Fortwo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Smart Crossblade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…