2005 • Daewoo
Damas
Daewoo Damas 0.8 (38 Hp) 2005Overall Score40.5/100
2005 Daewoo Damas vs 2003 Smart Crossblade Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Smart
Crossblade
Smart Crossblade 0.6 i (70 Hp) 2003Overall Score39.5/100
WINNER
Daewoo Damas
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
40.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo DamasSpecificationSmart Crossblade
DaewooMakeSmart
DamasModelCrossblade
2005Model year2003
MinivanBody typeCabriolet
7Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
Daewoo DamasSpecificationSmart Crossblade
24,5 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
0 km/hTop speed135 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement599 cc
38 HPPower70 HP
64 NmTorque100 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo DamasSpecificationSmart Crossblade
PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank22 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo DamasSpecificationSmart Crossblade
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size195/40 R16; 215/35 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo DamasSpecificationSmart Crossblade
3230 mmLength2500 mm
1400 mmWidth1515 mm
1920 mmHeight1549 mm
—Weight730 Kg
1840 mmWheelbase1812 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Daewoo Damas and 2003 Smart Crossblade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Damas leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…