2005 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.0 (50 Hp) 2005Overall Score40.5/100
2005 Skoda Fabia vs 2003 Smart Crossblade Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Smart
Crossblade
Smart Crossblade 0.6 i (70 Hp) 2003Overall Score39.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
40.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSmart Crossblade
SkodaMakeSmart
FabiaModelCrossblade
2005Model year2003
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSmart Crossblade
21,6 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
147 km/hTop speed135 km/h
997 ccEngine displacement599 cc
50 HPPower70 HP
84 NmTorque100 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSmart Crossblade
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank22 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSmart Crossblade
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
165/70 R14Tyre size195/40 R16; 215/35 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSmart Crossblade
4220 mmLength2500 mm
1646 mmWidth1515 mm
1452 mmHeight1549 mm
1010 KgWeight730 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase1812 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Skoda Fabia and 2003 Smart Crossblade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…