2003 • Smart
Crossblade
Smart Crossblade 0.6 i (70 Hp) 2003Overall Score39.5/100
2003 Smart Crossblade vs 2005 Skoda Fabia Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.0 (50 Hp) 2005Overall Score40.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationSkoda Fabia
SmartMakeSkoda
CrossbladeModelFabia
2003Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationSkoda Fabia
16,8 s0–100 km/h21,6 s
135 km/hTop speed147 km/h
599 ccEngine displacement997 cc
70 HPPower50 HP
100 NmTorque84 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationSkoda Fabia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
22 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationSkoda Fabia
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/40 R16; 215/35 R16Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationSkoda Fabia
2500 mmLength4220 mm
1515 mmWidth1646 mm
1549 mmHeight1452 mm
730 KgWeight1010 Kg
1812 mmWheelbase2462 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Smart Crossblade and 2005 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…