2003 • Smart
Crossblade
Smart Crossblade 0.6 i (70 Hp) 2003Overall Score39.5/100
2003 Smart Crossblade vs 2005 Renault Kangoo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Renault
Kangoo
Renault Kangoo 1.0 (59 Hp) 2005Overall Score40.5/100
WINNER
Renault Kangoo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationRenault Kangoo
SmartMakeRenault
CrossbladeModelKangoo
2003Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2Seats5
2Doors4/5
Performance
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationRenault Kangoo
16,8 s0–100 km/h21,2 s
135 km/hTop speed135 km/h
599 ccEngine displacement999 cc
70 HPPower59 HP
100 NmTorque81 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationRenault Kangoo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
22 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationRenault Kangoo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/40 R16; 215/35 R16Tyre size165/70 R14 C
YesABS—
Dimensions
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationRenault Kangoo
2500 mmLength4035 mm
1515 mmWidth1672 mm
1549 mmHeight1835 mm
730 KgWeight—
1812 mmWheelbase2605 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Smart Crossblade and 2005 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Kangoo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…