2003 • Smart
Crossblade
Smart Crossblade 0.6 i (70 Hp) 2003Overall Score39.5/100
2003 Smart Crossblade vs 2005 Daewoo Damas Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Daewoo
Damas
Daewoo Damas 0.8 (38 Hp) 2005Overall Score40.5/100
WINNER
Daewoo Damas
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationDaewoo Damas
SmartMakeDaewoo
CrossbladeModelDamas
2003Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2Seats7
2Doors5
Performance
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationDaewoo Damas
16,8 s0–100 km/h24,5 s
135 km/hTop speed0 km/h
599 ccEngine displacement796 cc
70 HPPower38 HP
100 NmTorque64 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationDaewoo Damas
PetrolFuel typePetrol
22 ltFuel tank37 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationDaewoo Damas
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/40 R16; 215/35 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Smart CrossbladeSpecificationDaewoo Damas
2500 mmLength3230 mm
1515 mmWidth1400 mm
1549 mmHeight1920 mm
730 KgWeight—
1812 mmWheelbase1840 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Smart Crossblade and 2005 Daewoo Damas approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Damas leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…