2000 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 2.0 (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Skoda Fabia vs 2000 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0i (130 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSaab 9-3
SkodaMakeSaab
FabiaModel9-3
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSaab 9-3
9,9 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
115 HPPower130 HP
170 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank68 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationSaab 9-3
3960 mmLength4629 mm
1645 mmWidth1711 mm
1450 mmHeight1428 mm
1110 KgWeight1295 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2605 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Skoda Fabia and 2000 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…