DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-6 vs 2000 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Fabia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSkoda
MX-6ModelFabia
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
204 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
170 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption11,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 88 HTyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4615 mmLength3960 mm
1750 mmWidth1645 mm
1310 mmHeight1450 mm
1120 KgWeight1110 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-6 and 2000 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…