DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Saab 9-3 vs 2000 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Fabia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationSkoda Fabia
SaabMakeSkoda
9-3ModelFabia
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationSkoda Fabia
11,0 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
130 HPPower115 HP
177 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationSkoda Fabia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank45 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationSkoda Fabia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationSkoda Fabia
4629 mmLength3960 mm
1711 mmWidth1645 mm
1428 mmHeight1450 mm
1295 KgWeight1110 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Saab 9-3 and 2000 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…