2000 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 2.0 (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Skoda Fabia vs 2000 Renault Laguna Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Renault
Laguna
Renault Laguna 2.0 (B56C/H/N) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Fabia
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationRenault Laguna
SkodaMakeRenault
FabiaModelLaguna
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationRenault Laguna
9,9 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
115 HPPower113 HP
170 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationRenault Laguna
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank66 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationRenault Laguna
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationRenault Laguna
3960 mmLength4508 mm
1645 mmWidth1752 mm
1450 mmHeight1432 mm
1110 KgWeight1255 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Skoda Fabia and 2000 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…