DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Skoda Fabia vs 2000 Mazda MX-6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Fabia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeMazda
FabiaModelMX-6
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
195 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
170 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 88 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3960 mmLength4615 mm
1645 mmWidth1750 mm
1450 mmHeight1310 mm
1110 KgWeight1120 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Skoda Fabia and 2000 Mazda MX-6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…