DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Skoda Fabia vs 2004 Rover 75 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 75

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Skoda FabiaSpecificationRover 75
SkodaMakeRover
FabiaModel75
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Skoda FabiaSpecificationRover 75
11,5 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
185 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
98 HPPower120 HP
240 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Skoda FabiaSpecificationRover 75
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank65 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Skoda FabiaSpecificationRover 75
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size215/55 R16 93 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Skoda FabiaSpecificationRover 75
3960 mmLength4747 mm
1645 mmWidth1778 mm
1450 mmHeight1424 mm
1155 KgWeight1445 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Skoda Fabia and 2004 Rover 75 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 75 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…