DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG ZS vs 2004 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

53.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationSkoda Fabia
MGMakeSkoda
ZSModelFabia
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationSkoda Fabia
9,0 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
19 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
117 HPPower98 HP
160 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationSkoda Fabia
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationSkoda Fabia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationSkoda Fabia
4520 mmLength3960 mm
1700 mmWidth1645 mm
1390 mmHeight1450 mm
1125 KgWeight1155 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG ZS and 2004 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…