DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Space Star vs 2004 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Space Star

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSkoda
Space StarModelFabia
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
185 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
112 HPPower98 HP
157 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption6,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4030 mmLength3960 mm
1715 mmWidth1645 mm
1515 mmHeight1450 mm
1235 KgWeight1155 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Space Star and 2004 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Space Star leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…