DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Skoda Fabia vs 2004 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Skoda FabiaSpecificationMazda 6
SkodaMakeMazda
FabiaModel6
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Skoda FabiaSpecificationMazda 6
11,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
185 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
98 HPPower120 HP
240 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Skoda FabiaSpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank64 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Skoda FabiaSpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Skoda FabiaSpecificationMazda 6
3960 mmLength4700 mm
1645 mmWidth1780 mm
1450 mmHeight1480 mm
1155 KgWeight1335 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Skoda Fabia and 2004 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…