DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Skoda Fabia vs 2004 Kia Shuma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Shuma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeKia
FabiaModelShuma
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
185 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1793 cc
98 HPPower114 HP
240 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption12,2 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3960 mmLength4525 mm
1645 mmWidth1720 mm
1450 mmHeight1415 mm
1155 KgWeight1135 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Skoda Fabia and 2004 Kia Shuma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Shuma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…