2004 • Skoda
Fabia
Skoda Fabia 1.9 TDI (98 Hp) 2004Overall Score53.25/100
2004 Skoda Fabia vs 2004 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.8 16V (120 Hp) 2004Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda FabiaSpecificationFord C-Max
SkodaMakeFord
FabiaModelC-Max
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Skoda FabiaSpecificationFord C-Max
11,5 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
185 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
98 HPPower120 HP
240 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda FabiaSpecificationFord C-Max
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda FabiaSpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda FabiaSpecificationFord C-Max
3960 mmLength4330 mm
1645 mmWidth1820 mm
1450 mmHeight1600 mm
1155 KgWeight1287 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Skoda Fabia and 2004 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…