DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Seat Exeo vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Seat ExeoSpecificationMazda 3
SeatMakeMazda
ExeoModel3
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Seat ExeoSpecificationMazda 3
10,5 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
204 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
290 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Seat ExeoSpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank51 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Seat ExeoSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Seat ExeoSpecificationMazda 3
4661 mmLength4460 mm
1772 mmWidth1795 mm
1430 mmHeight1450 mm
1505 KgWeight1205 Kg
2642 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Seat Exeo and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…