2013 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V Hybrid (177 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
2013 Kia Optima vs 2013 Seat Exeo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Seat
Exeo
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI CR (120 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationSeat Exeo
KiaMakeSeat
OptimaModelExeo
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationSeat Exeo
9,4 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
190 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
150 HPPower120 HP
180 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationSeat Exeo
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationSeat Exeo
4845 mmLength4661 mm
1830 mmWidth1772 mm
1455 mmHeight1430 mm
1587-1648 KgWeight1505 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2642 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Kia Optima and 2013 Seat Exeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…