DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 3 vs 2013 Seat Exeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationSeat Exeo
MazdaMakeSeat
3ModelExeo
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationSeat Exeo
8,9 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
195 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
210 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationSeat Exeo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank70 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationSeat Exeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationSeat Exeo
4460 mmLength4661 mm
1795 mmWidth1772 mm
1450 mmHeight1430 mm
1205 KgWeight1505 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2642 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 3 and 2013 Seat Exeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…