2013 • Seat
Exeo
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI CR (120 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
2013 Seat Exeo vs 2013 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V Hybrid (177 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat ExeoSpecificationKia Optima
SeatMakeKia
ExeoModelOptima
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Seat ExeoSpecificationKia Optima
10,5 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
204 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
120 HPPower150 HP
290 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Seat ExeoSpecificationKia Optima
DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption5,9 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Seat ExeoSpecificationKia Optima
4661 mmLength4845 mm
1772 mmWidth1830 mm
1430 mmHeight1455 mm
1505 KgWeight1587-1648 Kg
2642 mmWheelbase2795 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Seat Exeo and 2013 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…