DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Scion FR-S vs 2016 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Scion FR-S

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Scion FR-SSpecificationVolvo V40
ScionMakeVolvo
FR-SModelV40
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Scion FR-SSpecificationVolvo V40
7,6 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
225 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
200 HPPower190 HP
205 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Scion FR-SSpecificationVolvo V40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank62 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Scion FR-SSpecificationVolvo V40
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Scion FR-SSpecificationVolvo V40
4234 mmLength4369 mm
1775 mmWidth1783 mm
1285 mmHeight1439 mm
1251 KgWeight—
2570 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Scion FR-S and 2016 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Scion FR-S leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…