DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo S90 vs 2016 Scion FR-S Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Scion FR-S

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S90SpecificationScion FR-S
VolvoMakeScion
S90ModelFR-S
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Volvo S90SpecificationScion FR-S
7,2 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
230 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
190 HPPower200 HP
300 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S90SpecificationScion FR-S
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption10,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S90SpecificationScion FR-S
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
245/45 R18Tyre size215/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S90SpecificationScion FR-S
5083 mmLength4234 mm
1879 mmWidth1775 mm
1450 mmHeight1285 mm
—Weight1251 Kg
3061 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo S90 and 2016 Scion FR-S approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Scion FR-S leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…