DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo V40 vs 2016 Scion FR-S Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Scion FR-S

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationScion FR-S
VolvoMakeScion
V40ModelFR-S
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationScion FR-S
6,9 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
210 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
190 HPPower200 HP
300 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationScion FR-S
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption10,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationScion FR-S
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationScion FR-S
4369 mmLength4234 mm
1783 mmWidth1775 mm
1439 mmHeight1285 mm
—Weight1251 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo V40 and 2016 Scion FR-S approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Scion FR-S leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…