DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Scion FR-S vs 2016 Volvo S90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Scion FR-S

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Scion FR-SSpecificationVolvo S90
ScionMakeVolvo
FR-SModelS90
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Scion FR-SSpecificationVolvo S90
7,6 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
225 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
200 HPPower190 HP
205 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Scion FR-SSpecificationVolvo S90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Scion FR-SSpecificationVolvo S90
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears8
215/45 R17Tyre size245/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Scion FR-SSpecificationVolvo S90
4234 mmLength5083 mm
1775 mmWidth1879 mm
1285 mmHeight1450 mm
1251 KgWeight—
2570 mmWheelbase3061 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Scion FR-S and 2016 Volvo S90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Scion FR-S leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…