DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Scion FR-S vs 2016 Volkswagen Sharan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Scion FR-S

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ScionMakeVolkswagen
FR-SModelSharan
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeMinivan
4Seats5/7
2Doors5

Performance

7,6 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
225 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
200 HPPower184 HP
205 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R17Tyre size215/60 R16; 225/50 R17; 225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4234 mmLength4854 mm
1775 mmWidth1904 mm
1285 mmHeight1720 mm
1251 KgWeight1725 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2920 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Scion FR-S and 2016 Volkswagen Sharan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Scion FR-S leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…