DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Saab 9-3 vs 2005 Cadillac CTS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac CTS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeCadillac
9-3ModelCTS
2004Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
245 km/hTop speed226 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
250 HPPower215 HP
350 NmTorque262 Nm
—Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption17 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,9 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4828 mm
1762 mmWidth1795 mm
1434 mmHeight1441 mm
—Weight1705 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Saab 9-3 and 2005 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac CTS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…