DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Jaguar S-type vs 2004 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar S-type

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeSaab
S-typeModel9-3
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

7,6 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
233 km/hTop speed245 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
238 HPPower250 HP
293 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank62 lt
16,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,2 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/55 R16 WTyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4635 mm
1819 mmWidth1762 mm
1441 mmHeight1434 mm
1705 KgWeight—
2909 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Jaguar S-type and 2004 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar S-type leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…