DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Jaguar XJ vs 2004 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationSaab 9-3
JaguarMakeSaab
XJModel9-3
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationSaab 9-3
8,1 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
233 km/hTop speed245 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
238 HPPower250 HP
293 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank62 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,5 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationSaab 9-3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/45 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationSaab 9-3
5090 mmLength4635 mm
1860 mmWidth1762 mm
1448 mmHeight1434 mm
1545 KgWeight—
3034 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Jaguar XJ and 2004 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…