DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Saab 9-3 vs 2005 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationJaguar XJ
SaabMakeJaguar
9-3ModelXJ
2004Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationJaguar XJ
8,0 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
245 km/hTop speed233 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
250 HPPower238 HP
350 NmTorque293 Nm
—Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationJaguar XJ
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank85 lt
—Urban consumption15,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,7 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationJaguar XJ
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationJaguar XJ
4635 mmLength5090 mm
1762 mmWidth1860 mm
1434 mmHeight1448 mm
—Weight1545 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase3034 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Saab 9-3 and 2005 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…